1.6: Euler's Formula (2024)

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID
    6471
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Euler’s (pronounced ‘oilers’) formula connects complex exponentials, polar coordinates, and sines and cosines. It turns messy trig identities into tidy rules for exponentials. We will use it a lot. The formula is the following:

    \[e^{i\theta} = \cos (\theta) + i \sin (\theta). \label{1.6.1} \]

    There are many ways to approach Euler’s formula. Our approach is to simply take Equation \ref{1.6.1} as the definition of complex exponentials. This is legal, but does not show that it’s a good definition. To do that we need to show the \(e^{i \theta}\) obeys all the rules we expect of an exponential. To do that we go systematically through the properties of exponentials and check that they hold for complex exponentials.

    \(e^{i \theta}\) behaves like a true exponential

    P1

    \(e^{i t}\) differentiates as expected:

    \[\dfrac{de^{it}}{dt} = ie^{it}.\nonumber \]

    Proof

    This follows directly from the definition in Equation \ref{1.6.1}:

    \[ \begin{align*} \dfrac{de^{it}}{dt} &= \dfrac{d}{dt} (\cos (t) + i \sin (t)) \\[4pt] &= -\sin (t) + i \cos (t) \\[4pt] &= i (\cos (t) + i \sin (t)) \\[4pt] &= ie^{it}. \end{align*} \]

    P2

    \[e^{i \cdot 0} = 1 . \nonumber \]

    Proof

    This follows directly from the definition in Equation \ref{1.6.1}:

    \(e^{i \cdot 0} = \cos (0) + i \sin (0) = 1\).

    P3

    The usual rules of exponents hold:

    \[e^{ia} e^{ib} = e^{i(a + b)}.\nonumber \]

    Proof

    This relies on the cosine and sine addition formulas and the definition in Equation \ref{1.6.1}:

    \[\begin{align*} e^{ia} \cdot e^{ib} & = (\cos (a) + i \sin (a)) \cdot (\cos (b) + i \sin (b)) \\[4pt] & = \cos (a) \cos (b) - \sin (a) \sin (b) + i (\cos (a) \sin (b) + \sin (a) \cos (b)) \\[4pt] & = \cos (a + b) + i \sin (a + b) = e^{i (a + b)}. \end{align*} \]

    P4

    The definition of \(e^{i \theta}\) is consistent with the power series for \(e^x\).

    Proof

    To see this we have to recall the power series for \(e^x\), \(\cos (x)\) and \(\sin (x)\). They are

    \[\begin{align*} e^x & = 1 + x + \dfrac{x^2}{2!} + \dfrac{x^3}{3!} + \dfrac{x^4}{4!} + ... \\[4pt] \cos (x) & = 1 - \dfrac{x^2}{2!} + \dfrac{x^4}{4!} - \dfrac{x^6}{6!} + \ldots \\[4pt] \sin (x) & = x - \dfrac{x^3}{3!} + \dfrac{x^5}{5!} + ... \end{align*} \]

    Now we can write the power series for \(e^{i \theta}\) and then split it into the power series for sine and cosine:

    \[\begin{align*} e^{i \theta} & = \sum_{0}^{\infty} \dfrac{(i\theta)^n}{n!} \\[4pt] & = \sum_{0}^{\infty} (-1)^k \dfrac{\theta ^{2k}}{(2k)!} + i \sum_{0}^{\infty} (-1)^k \dfrac{\theta ^{2k + 1}}{(2k + 1)!} \\[4pt] & = \cos (\theta) + i \sin (\theta). \end{align*} \]

    So the Euler formula definition is consistent with the usual power series for \(e^x\).

    Properties P1-P4 should convince you that \(e^{i \theta}\) behaves like an exponential.

    Complex Exponentials and Polar Form

    Now let’s turn to the relation between polar coordinates and complex exponentials.

    Suppose \(z = x + iy\) has polar coordinates \(r\) and \(\theta\). That is, we have \(x = r \cos (\theta)\) and \(y = r \sin (\theta)\). Thus, we get the important relationship

    \[ \begin{align*} z &= x + iy \\[4pt] &= r \cos (\theta) + i r \sin (\theta) \\[4pt] &= r (\cos (\theta) + i \sin (\theta)) \\[4pt] &= r e^{i \theta}. \end{align*} \]

    This is so important you shouldn’t proceed without understanding. We also record it without the intermediate equation.

    \[z = x + iy = r e^{i \theta}. \nonumber \]

    Because \(r\) and \(\theta\) are the polar coordinates of \((x, y)\) we call \(z = r e^{i \theta}\) the polar form of \(z\).

    Let’s now verify that magnitude, argument, conjugate, multiplication and division are easy in polar form.

    Magnitude

    \(|e^{i \theta}| = 1\).

    Proof

    \[ \begin{align*} |e^{i \theta}| &= |\cos (\theta) + i \sin (\theta)| \\[4pt] &= \sqrt{\cos ^2 (\theta) + \sin ^2 (\theta)} \\[4pt] &= 1 . \end{align*} \]

    In words, this says that \(e^{i \theta}\) is always on the unit circle - this is useful to remember!

    Likewise, if \(z = r e^{i \theta}\) then \(|z| = r\). You can calculate this, but it should be clear from the definitions: \(|z|\) is the distance from \(z\) to the origin, which is exactly the same definition as for \(r\).

    Argument

    If \(z = r e^{i \theta}\) then \(\text{arg} (z) = \theta\).

    Proof

    This is again the definition: the argument is the polar angle \(\theta\).

    Conjugate

    \(\overline{(z = r e^{i \theta})} = r e^{-i \theta}\).

    Proof

    \[ \begin{align*} \overline{(z = r e^{i \theta})} &= \overline{r (\cos (\theta) + i \sin (\theta))} \\[4pt] &= r (\cos (\theta) - i \sin (\theta)) \\[4pt] &= r(\cos (-\theta) + i \sin (-\theta)) \\[4pt] &= r e^{-i \theta}. \end{align*} \]

    In words: complex conjugation changes the sign of the argument.

    Multiplication

    If \(z_1 = r_1 e^{i \theta_1}\) and \(z_2 = r_2 e^{i \theta_2}\) then

    \[z_1 z_2 = r_1 r_2 e^{i (\theta_1 + \theta_2)}. \nonumber \]

    This is what mathematicians call trivial to see, just write the multiplication down. In words, the formula says the for \(z_1 z_2\) the magnitudes multiply and the arguments add.

    Division

    Again it's trivial that

    \(\dfrac{r_1 e^{i \theta_1}}{r_2 e^{i \theta_2}} = \dfrac{r_1}{r_2} e^{i (\theta_1 - \theta_2)}.\)

    Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Multiplication by 2\(i\)

    Here’s a simple but important example. By looking at the graph we see that the number \(2i\) has magnitude 2 and argument \(\pi/2\). So in polar coordinates it equals \(2e^{i \pi /2}\). This means that multiplication by \(2i\) multiplies lengths by 2 and add \(\pi/2\) to arguments, i.e. rotates by \(90^{\circ}\). The effect is shown in the figures below

    1.6: Euler's Formula (2)

    Example \(\PageIndex{2}\): Rasing to a power

    Let's compute \((1 + i)^6\) and \((\dfrac{1 + i \sqrt{3}}{2})^3\)

    Solution

    \(1 + i\) has magnitude = \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\text{arg} = \pi /4\), so \(1 + i = \sqrt{2} e^{i \pi /4}\). Rasing to a power is now easy:

    \((1 + i)^6 = (\sqrt{2} e^{i \pi /4})^6 = 8 e^{6i \pi /4} = 8 e^{3i \pi /2} = -8i\).

    Similarly, \(\dfrac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2} = e^{i \pi / 3}\), so \((\dfrac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2})^3 = (1 \cdot e^{i \pi / 3})^3 = e^{i \pi} = -1\)

    Complexification or Complex Replacement

    In the next example we will illustrate the technique of complexification or complex replacement. This can be used to simplify a trigonometric integral. It will come in handy when we need to compute certain integrals.

    Example \(\PageIndex{3}\)

    Use complex replacement to compute

    \[I = \int e^x \cos (2x)\ dx. \nonumber \]

    Solution

    We have Euler's formula

    \[e^{2ix} = \cos (2x) + i \sin (2x), \nonumber \]

    so \(\cos (2x) = \text{Re} (e^{2ix})\). The complex replacement trick is to replace \(\cos (2x)\) by \(e^{2ix}\). We get (justification below)

    \[I_c = \int e^x \cos 2x + ie^x \sin 2x \ dx \nonumber \]

    with

    \[I = \text{Re} (I_c) \nonumber \]

    Computing \(I_c\) is straightforward:

    \[I_c = \int e^x e^{i2x}\ dx = \int e^{x(1 + 2i)}\ dx = \dfrac{e^{x(1 + 2i)}}{1 + 2i}. \nonumber \]

    Here we will do the computation first in rectangular coordinates. In applications, for example throughout 18.03, polar form is often preferred because it is easier and gives the answer in a more useable form.

    \[\begin{array} {rcl} {I_c} & = & {\dfrac{e^{x(1 + 2i)}}{1 + 2i} \cdot \dfrac{1 - 2i}{1 - 2i}} \\ {} & = & {\dfrac{e^x (\cos (2x) + i \sin (2x)) (1 - 2i)}{5}} \\ {} & = & {\dfrac{1}{5} e^x (\cos (2x) + 2 \sin (2x) + i (-2 \cos (2x) + \sin (2x)))} \end{array} \nonumber \]

    So,

    \[I = \text{Re} (I_c) = \dfrac{1}{5} e^x (\cos (2x) + 2\sin (2x)). \nonumber \]

    Justification of complex replacement. The trick comes by cleverly adding a new integral to \(I\) as follows, Let \(J = \int e^x \sin (2x)\ dx\). Then we let

    \[I_c = I + iJ = \int e^x (\cos (2x) + i \sin (2x)) \ dx = \int e^x 2^{2ix}\ dx. \nonumber \]

    Clearly, by construction, \(\text{Re} (I_c) = I\) as claimed above.

    Alternative using polar coordinates to simplify the expression for \(I_c\):

    In polar form, we have \(1 + 2i = re^{i \phi}\), where \(r = \sqrt{5}\) and \(\phi = \text{arg} (1 + 2i) = \text{tan}^{-1} (2)\) in the first quadrant. Then:

    \(I_c = \dfrac{e^{x(1 + 2i)}}{\sqrt{5} e^{i \phi}} = \dfrac{e^x}{\sqrt{5}} e^{i(2x - \phi)} = \dfrac{e^x}{\sqrt{5}} (\cos (2x - \phi) + i \sin (2x - \phi))\).

    Thus,

    \[I = \text{Re} (I_c) = \dfrac{e^x}{\sqrt{5}} \cos (2x - \phi). \nonumber \]

    \(N\)th roots

    We are going to need to be able to find the \(n\)th roots of complex numbers, i.e., solve equations of the form

    \[z^N = c, \nonumber \]

    where \(c\) is a given complex number. This can be done most conveniently by expressing \(c\) and \(z\) in polar form, \(c = Re^{i \phi}\) and \(z = re^{i \theta}\). Then, upon substituting, we have to solve

    \[r^N e^{iN \theta} = Re^{i \phi} \nonumber \]

    For the complex numbers on the left and right to be equal, their magnitudes must be the same and their arguments can only differ by an integer multiple of \(2\pi\). This gives

    \[r = R^{1/N} \; (N \theta = \phi + 2\pi n), \; where\;n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, ... \nonumber \]

    Solving for \(\theta\), we have

    \[\theta = \dfrac{\phi}{N} + \dfrac{2\pi n}{N}. \nonumber \]

    Example \(\PageIndex{4}\)

    Find all 5 fifth roots of 2.

    Solution

    For \(c = 2\), we have \(R = 2\) and \(\phi = 0\), so the fifth roots of 2 are

    \(z_n = 2^{1/5} e^{2n \pi i/5}\), where \(n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, ...\)

    Looking at the right hand side we see that for \(n = 5\) we have \(2^{1/5} e^{2\pi i}\) which is exactly the same as the root when \(n = 0\), i.e. \(2^{1/5} e^{0i}\). Likewise \(n = 6\) gives exactly the same root as \(n = 1\), and so on. This means, we have 5 different roots corresponding to \(n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4\).

    \(z_n = 2^{1/5}, e^{1/5} e^{2\pi i/5}, e^{1/5} e^{4\pi i/5}, e^{1/5} e^{6\pi i/5}, e^{1/5} e^{8\pi i/5}\)

    Similarly we can say that in general \(c = Re^{i \phi}\) has \(N\) distinct \(N\) th roots:

    \(z_n = r^{1/N} e^{i \phi / N + i 2\pi (n/N)}\) for \(n = 0, 1, 2, ..., N - 1\).

    Example \(\PageIndex{5}\)

    Find the 4 forth roots of 1.

    Solution

    We need to solve \(z^4 = 1\), so \(\phi = 0\). So the 4 distinct fourth roots are in polar form

    \[z_n = 1, e^{i \pi /2}, e^{i \pi}, e^{i 3 \pi /2} \nonumber \]

    and in Cartesian representation

    \[z_n = 1, i, -1, -i. \nonumber \]

    Example \(\PageIndex{6}\)

    Find the 3 cube roots of -1.

    Solution

    \(z^2 = -1 = e^{i \pi + i 2 \pi n}\). So, \(z_n = e^{i \pi + i 2 \pi (n/3)}\) and the 3 cube roots are \(e^{i \pi /3}\), \(e^{i \pi}\), \(e^{i 5 \pi /3}\). Since \(\pi /3\) radians is \(60^{\circ}\) we can simplify:

    \(e^{i \pi /3} = \cos (\pi / 3) + i \sin (\pi /3) = \dfrac{1}{2} + i \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \Rightarrow z_n = -1, \dfrac{1}{2} \pm i \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\)

    Example \(\PageIndex{7}\)

    Find the 5 fifth roots of \(1 + i\).

    Solution

    \[z^5 = 1 + i = \sqrt{2} e^{i (\pi / 4 + 2n\pi)} \nonumber \]

    for \(n = 0, 1, 2, ...\). So, the 5 fifth roots are

    \(2^{1/10} e^{i\pi /20}\), \(2^{1/10} e^{i9\pi /20}\), \(2^{1/10} e^{i17\pi /20}\), \(2^{1/10} e^{i25\pi /20}\), \(2^{1/10} e^{i33\pi /20}\).

    Using a calculator we could write these numerically as \(a + bi\), but there is no easy simplification.

    Example \(\PageIndex{8}\)

    We should check that our technique works as expected for a simple problem. Find the 2 square roots of 4.

    Solution

    \(z^2 = 4 e^{i2 \pi n}\). So, \(z_n = 2e^{i \pi n}\), with \(n = 0, 1\). So the two roots are \(2e^0 = 2\) and \(2e^{i\pi} = -2\) as expected!

    geometry of \(N\)th roots

    Looking at the examples above we see that roots are always spaced evenly around a circle centered at the origin. For example, the fifth roots of \(1 + i\) are spaced at increments of \(2\pi / 5\) radians around the circle of radius \(2^{1/5}\).

    Note also that the roots of real numbers always come in conjugate pairs.

    1.6: Euler's Formula (3)

    1.6: Euler's Formula (2024)

    FAQs

    1.6: Euler's Formula? ›

    The formula is the following: eiθ=cos(θ)+isin(θ). There are many ways to approach Euler's formula.

    What is the formula for Euler's theorem? ›

    Euler's Formula states that for any real x , eix=cosx+isinx, e i x = cos ⁡ x + i sin ⁡ where i is the imaginary unit, i=√−1 .

    What is the full Euler's formula? ›

    Euler's formula, either of two important mathematical theorems of Leonhard Euler. The first formula, used in trigonometry and also called the Euler identity, says eix = cos x + isin x, where e is the base of the natural logarithm and i is the square root of −1 (see imaginary number).

    What is the equation for Euler's God? ›

    One of the most beautiful equations in mathematics is considered to be Euler's formula, also known as Euler's identity. This equation, e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0, is a compact representation of several important mathematical concepts and has far-reaching implications in many areas of mathematics and physics including AI.

    What is the formula for calculating Euler's number? ›

    Euler's Number (e)

    The Euler's number 'e', is the limit of (1 + 1/n)n as n approaches infinity, an expression that arises in the study of compound interest. It can also be expressed as the sum of infinite numbers. e = ∑ n = 0 ∞ 1 n ! = 1 1 + 1 1 + 1 1.2 + 1 1.2 .

    Why is e iπ =- 1? ›

    Euler's identity is actually a special case of Euler's formula, e^(i*x) = cos x + i sin x, when x is equal to pi. When x is equal to pi, cosine of pi equals -1 and sine of pi equals 0, and we get e^(i*pi) = -1 + 0i. The 0 imaginary part goes away, and we get e^(i*pi) = -1.

    What is the most beautiful theorem in math? ›

    A poll of readers conducted by The Mathematical Intelligencer in 1990 named Euler's identity as the "most beautiful theorem in mathematics".

    What is the most beautiful equation in math? ›

    Euler's pioneering equation, the 'most beautiful equation in mathematics', links the five most important constants in the subject: 1, 0, π, e and i. Central to both mathematics and physics, it has also featured in a criminal court case, on a postage stamp, and appeared twice in The Simpsons.

    How to solve Euler equation? ›

    The basic approach to solving Euler equations is similar to the approach used to solve constant-coefficient equations: assume a particular form for the solution with one constant “to be determined”, plug that form into the differential equation, simplify and solve the resulting equation for the constant, and then ...

    What is the mathematical formula of God? ›

    The equality 𝒆𝝅𝒊 + 𝟏 = 𝟎 is called Euler's Identity, thanks to the 18th century mathematician, Leonhard Euler. In 1988 it was voted the most beautiful formula in mathematics.

    What is the God formula in physics? ›

    Where G = (E-mc^2)^2 + (F-ma)^2 + … (Higher order terms). A key component of the Universe (Space-time) gave rise to the Ultimate Physics Equation (The God Equation) where all particles, physical constants, equations/laws originates from.

    What is Euler's law? ›

    Euler's first law

    Internal forces between the particles that make up a body do not contribute to changing the momentum of the body as there is an equal and opposite force resulting in no net effect. The linear momentum of a rigid body is the product of the mass of the body and the velocity of its center of mass vcm.

    What is Euler's theorem simple? ›

    We then state Euler's theorem which states that the remainder of aϕ(m) when divided by a positive integer m that is relatively prime to a is 1.

    What are Euler's equations? ›

    In fluid dynamics, the Euler equations are a set of partial differential equations governing adiabatic and inviscid flow. They are named after Leonhard Euler.

    What is the statement of Euler's equation? ›

    Answer: Euler's Equation of Motion is a statement of linear momentum conservation for the flow of an inviscid fluid. In fluid dynamics, Euler's equation describes the flow of a fluid without accounting for the fluid's viscosity. The equations corresponding to the Navier–Stokes equations.

    How to get Euler equation? ›

    The basic approach to solving Euler equations is similar to the approach used to solve constant-coefficient equations: assume a particular form for the solution with one constant “to be determined”, plug that form into the differential equation, simplify and solve the resulting equation for the constant, and then ...

    Top Articles
    What is sales and operations planning (S&OP)? Complete guide
    “S&OP stappenplan (Sales & Operations planning) – Slimstock”
    Dunhams Treestands
    Best Big Jumpshot 2K23
    Regal Amc Near Me
    Blanchard St Denis Funeral Home Obituaries
    Summit County Juvenile Court
    Irving Hac
    Midway Antique Mall Consignor Access
    Acbl Homeport
    Espn Expert Picks Week 2
    Ncaaf Reference
    Jet Ski Rental Conneaut Lake Pa
    Oscar Nominated Brings Winning Profile to the Kentucky Turf Cup
    Gwdonate Org
    Springfield Mo Craiglist
    24 Best Things To Do in Great Yarmouth Norfolk
    Lonesome Valley Barber
    Allentown Craigslist Heavy Equipment
    Aps Day Spa Evesham
    Sulfur - Element information, properties and uses
    Https Paperlesspay Talx Com Boydgaming
    Wemod Vampire Survivors
    Talk To Me Showtimes Near Marcus Valley Grand Cinema
    Prep Spotlight Tv Mn
    Barista Breast Expansion
    The 15 Best Sites to Watch Movies for Free (Legally!)
    Delta Township Bsa
    Medline Industries, LP hiring Warehouse Operator - Salt Lake City in Salt Lake City, UT | LinkedIn
    Mami No 1 Ott
    101 Lewman Way Jeffersonville In
    Babydepot Registry
    Mawal Gameroom Download
    Craigslist Sf Garage Sales
    How often should you visit your Barber?
    Rush County Busted Newspaper
    Teenbeautyfitness
    Craigslist Org Sf
    Nearest Ups Office To Me
    Hellgirl000
    Gvod 6014
    Yogu Cheshire
    Craigslist Lakeside Az
    Emulating Web Browser in a Dedicated Intermediary Box
    Ferguson Showroom West Chester Pa
    Craigslist Woodward
    Ups Authorized Shipping Provider Price Photos
    Rocket Lab hiring Integration &amp; Test Engineer I/II in Long Beach, CA | LinkedIn
    Sara Carter Fox News Photos
    Myra's Floral Princeton Wv
    Minute Clinic Mooresville Nc
    Fallout 76 Fox Locations
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Annamae Dooley

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6089

    Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

    Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Annamae Dooley

    Birthday: 2001-07-26

    Address: 9687 Tambra Meadow, Bradleyhaven, TN 53219

    Phone: +9316045904039

    Job: Future Coordinator

    Hobby: Archery, Couponing, Poi, Kite flying, Knitting, Rappelling, Baseball

    Introduction: My name is Annamae Dooley, I am a witty, quaint, lovely, clever, rich, sparkling, powerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.